4.7 Article

Coastal subsidence in Oregon, USA, during the giant Cascadia earthquake of AD 1700

Journal

QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS
Volume 30, Issue 3-4, Pages 364-376

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.11.017

Keywords

Cascadia subduction zone; Earthquake; Coseismic subsidence; Foraminifera

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [EAR-0842728]
  2. United States Geological Survey, Society of Sedimentary Geology (SEPM)
  3. University of Pennsylvania
  4. National Oceanographic Science Accelerator Mass Spectrometer
  5. Earthquake Hazards Program of the United States Geological Survey
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [bgs05002] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. NERC [bgs05002] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Directorate For Geosciences
  9. Division Of Ocean Sciences [0753487] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Division Of Earth Sciences
  11. Directorate For Geosciences [0842728] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantitative estimates of land-level change during the giant AD 1700 Cascadia earthquake along the Oregon coast are inferred from relative sea-level changes reconstructed from fossil foraminiferal assemblages preserved within the stratigraphic record. A transfer function, based upon a regional training set of modern sediment samples from Oregon estuaries, is calibrated to fossil assemblages in sequences of samples across buried peat-mud and peat-sand contacts marking the AD 1700 earthquake. Reconstructions of sample elevations with sample-specific errors estimate the amount of coastal subsidence during the earthquake at six sites along 400 km of coast. The elevation estimates are supported by lithological, carbon isotope, and faunal tidal zonation data. Coseismic subsidence at Nehalem River, Nestucca River, Salmon River, Alsea Bay, Siuslaw River and South Slough varies between 0.18 m and 0.85 m with errors between 0.18 m and 0.32 m. These subsidence estimates are more precise, consistent, and generally lower than previous semi-quantitative estimates. Following earlier comparisons of semi-quantitative subsidence estimates with elastic dislocation models of megathrust rupture during great earthquakes, our lower estimates for central and northern Oregon are consistent with modeled rates of strain accumulation and amounts of slip on the subduction megathrust, and thus, with a magnitude of 9 for the AD 1700 earthquake. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available