4.7 Article

Late Quaternary floods and droughts in the Nile valley, Sudan: new evidence from optically stimulated luminescence and AMS radiocarbon dating

Journal

QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS
Volume 29, Issue 9-10, Pages 1116-1137

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.02.018

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our results show that the late Pleistocene Nile in northern Sudan was shifting position and actively aggrading at 145 +/- 20 kyr, 83 +/- 24 kyr, 32 +/- 8 kyr and 20.7 +/- 0.2 kyr and indicate, for the first time, a phase of high-energy flow in the White Nile at 27.8 +/- 3.2 kyr, with still high but somewhat reduced flow in that river at 13.3 kyr, 10 kyr and 4.8-4.0 kyr. Beach ridges associated with a 386 m strandline of the White Nile have OSL ages of 27.5 +/- 2.7 kyr and 14.5 +/- 1.6 kyr. The Holocene terraces and former channels of the main Nile have ages of 11 kyr, 6.5-5.0 kyr and 4.8-4.0 kyr, after which there was a general decline in flood discharge. The now arid main Nile valley in northern Sudan was significantly wetter during the early to middle Holocene, with a lake up to 450 km(2) in area, fed by an overflow channel from the early Holocene Nile between 9.5 kyr and 7.5 kyr. Previously stable late Pleistocene dunes were reactivated at intervals during the Holocene, with five samples from the White Nile valley indicating brief phases of Holocene dune activity at 9.9 +/- 2.0 kyr, 9.0 +/- 2.8 kyr, 6.6 +/- 0.9 kyr, 4.8 +/- 0.9 kyr and 2.9 +/- 0.5 kyr, the earliest of which occurred within periods of generally wetter climate and higher Nile flow. The youngest freshwater shells on the Khor Abu Habl alluvial fan west of the White Nile correspond to a time of regionally wetter climate between 1.7 and 1.0 kyr. Our results suggest that millennial scale climatic instability may have been characteristic of Holocene climates in this region. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available