4.2 Article

A geochronologic framework for the Ziegler Reservoir fossil site, Snowmass Village, Colorado

Journal

QUATERNARY RESEARCH
Volume 82, Issue 3, Pages 490-503

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.yqres.2014.03.004

Keywords

Luminescence dating; Radiocarbon dating; Surface exposure dating; U-series dating; Ziegler Reservoir

Funding

  1. Division Of Earth Sciences
  2. Directorate For Geosciences [1153689] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Ziegler Reservoir fossil site near Snowmass Village, Colorado (USA), provides a unique opportunity to reconstruct high-altitude paleoenvironmental conditions in the Rocky Mountains during the Last Interglacial Period. We used four different techniques to establish a chronological framework for the site. Radiocarbon dating of lake organics, bone collagen, and shell carbonate, and in situ cosmogenic Be-10 and Al-26 ages on a boulder on the crest of a moraine that impounded the lake suggest that the ages of the sediments that hosted the fossils are between similar to 140 lea and >45 ka. Uranium-series ages of vertebrate remains generally fall within these bounds, but extremely low uranium concentrations and evidence of open-system behavior limit their utility. Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) ages (n = 18) obtained from fine-grained quartz maintain stratigraphic order, were replicable, and provide reliable ages for the lake sediments. Analysis of the equivalent dose (D-E) dispersion of the OSL samples showed that the sediments were fully bleached prior to deposition and low scatter suggests that eolian processes were likely the dominant transport mechanism for fine-grained sediments into the lake. The resulting ages show that the fossil-bearing sediments span the latest part of Marine Oxygen Isotope Stage (MIS) 6, all of MIS 5 and MIS 4, and the earliest part of MIS 3. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of University of Washington.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available