4.0 Article

Distribution of Hypertrophy and Late Gadolinium Enhancement in Children and Adolescents with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Journal

CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages E258-E267

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/chd.12286

Keywords

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy; Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Echocardiography; Gadolinium Delayed Enhancement

Funding

  1. Labatt Family Heart Centre Innovation Funds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundWhile well characterized in adult patients, the pattern of hypertrophy and the extent of myocardial scarring in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) are insufficiently known. The aim of this study was to assess the hypertrophy patterns and the prevalence and clinical significance of scars in the hearts of young patients with HCM. Methods and ResultsA retrospective analysis of the imaging findings of 38 children (aged 12.832 years, 30 males) with HCM who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) was performed. In addition to left ventricular mass and volumes, the examinations were assessed for the pattern of hypertrophy and presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). A myocardial signal intensity6 standard deviations above the mean of normal myocardium defined positive LGE. Left ventricular mass index averaged 110 +/- 34g/m(2). Nineteen children (50%) had diffuse septal, 13 (34%) diffuse concentric and 6 (16%) isolated basal hypertrophy. Seven children (18%) had LGE. Patients with LGE had a greater left ventricular mass index than those without (136 +/- 34g/m(2) vs. 104 +/- 31g/m(2), P=.025). The only two patients who presented with an episode of aborted sudden cardiac death had LGE (P=.03). ConclusionsThe most common hypertrophy pattern in children with HCM was diffuse septal hypertrophy. The incidence of LGE observed is lower than that reported in adults. The presence of LGE appears to confer a risk for adverse events.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available