4.2 Article

Luminescence dating of a hearth from the archaeological site of Jiangxigou in the Qinghai Lake area of the northeastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau

Journal

QUATERNARY GEOCHRONOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages 107-110

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quageo.2012.01.010

Keywords

Qinghai-Tibetan plateau (QTP); Qinghai lake area; Bangxigou archaeological site; Luminescence dating; Prehistoric occupation pattern

Funding

  1. China Geological Survey [1212011120046]
  2. China NSF [41121001, 41172168, 41161018]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Climate Change: Carbon Budget and Relevant Issues) [XDA05120501]
  4. One Hundred Talent Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [A0961]
  5. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  6. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci [0841435] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Archeological research over the past several years has started to provide evidence relevant to understanding both the timing of and processes for human colonization of the high Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Much of this research has been in the Qinghai Lake area and the Qaidam Basin in the northeastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. However, chronological data are still limited. Recently, a hearth was discovered in the Jiangxigou site in the south of the Qinghai Lake area, which was likely used by prehistoric hunters. The site is in the mouth of a canyon approximately 4.5 km from Qinghai Lake. Previous ages in this site are based on C-14 dating only. The current study provides additional OSL dates for the hearth. The ages of four OSL samples bracketing the hearth range from 12.9 +/- 0.9 to 14.4 +/- 1.0 ka, but standard deviations overlap extensively and they likely represent the same age. The OSL ages show that by about 14.3 +/- 1.0 ka prehistoric peoples were living in the Qinghai Like area. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available