Journal
QUATERNARY GEOCHRONOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages 105-113Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quageo.2012.02.028
Keywords
U-Pb geochronology; Speleothem; Uranium; Lead; ICPMS
Funding
- Australian Research Council Discovery [DP0985214, DP0773700, DP110102185]
- Australian Research Council [DP0773700, DP0985214] Funding Source: Australian Research Council
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Speleothem proxy records, coupled with U-Th chronologies, are widely used in studies of palaeoclimate, landscape and faunal evolution. The prospect of extending such studies beyond similar to 500 ka has fuelled considerable interest in the U-Pb dating method. While theoretical mechanisms for the transport and incorporation of both U and Pb in speleothem calcite remains a matter of debate, it is clear that natural samples span a broad spectrum of compositional variation, and likely contain Pb components with multiple origins and/or transport pathways. Based upon these observations, optimal methods for sample selection are proposed and a variety of techniques for age estimation are explored. Laser ablation ICPMS and autoradiography are ideal rapid screening methods for reconnaissance studies. Common Pb isotopic variability is a key parameter in the choice of analytical strategy for age determination. In large U-Pb studies where invariant common Pb can be established, common Pb corrected ages can be produced for individual sample aliquots promoting rapid throughput and permitting the establishment of detailed age-depth models. Even with these technologies, however, age resolution becomes an issue beyond a few million years, at which time alternative strategies for developing internal speleothem chronologies, such as lamina counting, must be considered in unison with U-Pb dating. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available