4.4 Review

IRREDUCIBLE INCOHERENCE AND INTELLIGENT DESIGN A LOOK INTO THE CONCEPTUAL TOOLBOX OF A PSEUDOSCIENCE

Journal

QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY
Volume 85, Issue 4, Pages 473-482

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/656904

Keywords

irreducible complexity; evolutionary biology; pseudoscience conceptual equivocations; Intelligent Design Creationism

Categories

Funding

  1. Flemish Fund for Scientific Research (FWO)
  2. Ghent University [BOF 08/24J/041]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The concept of Irreducible Complexity (IC) has played a pivotal role in the resurgence of the creationist movement over the past two decades Evolutional) biologists and philosophers have unambiguously rejected the purported demonstration of intelligent design in nature, but there have been several apparently contradictory lines of criticism We argue that this is in fact due to Michael Behe s own incoherent definition and use of IC flits paper offers an analysis of several equivocations inherent in the concept of Irreducible Complexity and discusses the way in which advocates of the Intelligent Design Creationism (IDC) have conveniently turned IC into a moving target An analysis of these rhetorical strategies helps us to understand why IC has gained such prominence in the IDC movement, and why despite its complete lack of scientific merits it has even convinced some knowledgeable persons of the impending demise of evolutionary theory

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available