4.6 Review

A review of forecast error covariance statistics in atmospheric variational data assimilation. I: Characteristics and measurements of forecast error covariances

Journal

QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY
Volume 134, Issue 637, Pages 1951-1970

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/qj.339

Keywords

background error statistics; balance; calibration; multivariate; separability

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [ncas10003, earth010005] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. NERC [earth010005, ncas10003] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reviews the characteristics of forecast error statistics in meteorological data assimilation from the substantial literature on this Subject. It is shown how forecast error statistics appear in the data assimilation problem through the background error covariance matrix, B. The mathematical and physical properties of the covariances are surveyed in relation to a number of leading systems that are in use for operational weather forecasting. Different Studies emphasize different aspects of B, and the known ways that B can impact the assimilation are brought together. Treating B practical, in data assimilation is problematic. One such problem is in the numerical measurement of B, and five calibration methods are reviewed, including analysis of innovations. analysis of forecast differences and ensemble methods. Another problem is the prohibitive size of B. This needs special treatment in data assimilation, and is covered in a companion article (Part II). Examples are drawn from the literature that show the univariate and multivariate structure of the B-matrix, in terms of variances and correlations. which are interpreted in terms of the properties of the atmosphere. The need for an accurate quantification of forecast error statistics is emphasized. Copyright (C) 2008 Royal Meteorological Society

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available