4.1 Review

The classic cadherins in synaptic specificity

Journal

CELL ADHESION & MIGRATION
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages 193-201

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/19336918.2014.1000072

Keywords

classic cadherins; cognitive disorders; molecular identity; synaptic specificity; EC; extracellular cadherin; DG; dentate gyrus; RGCs; retinal ganglion cells; DN-cadherin; Drosophila N-cadherin; SNPs; single nucleotide polymorphisms; ADHD; attention deficit; hyperactivity disorder; BC; bipolar cell; EGF; epidermal growth factor

Categories

Funding

  1. Whitehall foundation
  2. Edward Mallinckrodt Jr. foundation
  3. Sloan foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During brain development, billions of neurons organize into highly specific circuits. To form specific circuits, neurons must build the appropriate types of synapses with appropriate types of synaptic partners while avoiding incorrect partners in a dense cellular environment. Defining the cellular and molecular rules that govern specific circuit formation has significant scientific and clinical relevance because fine scale connectivity defects are thought to underlie many cognitive and psychiatric disorders. Organizing specific neural circuits is an enormously complicated developmental process that requires the concerted action of many molecules, neural activity, and temporal events. This review focuses on one class of molecules postulated to play an important role in target selection and specific synapse formation: the classic cadherins. Cadherins have a well-established role in epithelial cell adhesion, and although it has long been appreciated that most cadherins are expressed in the brain, their role in synaptic specificity is just beginning to be unraveled. Here, we review past and present studies implicating cadherins as active participants in the formation, function, and dysfunction of specific neural circuits and pose some of the major remaining questions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available