Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.When Are Positive Clinical Trials in Oncology Truly Positive?
Alberto Ocana et al.
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE (2011)
Willingness to Share Research Data Is Related to the Strength of the Evidence and the Quality of Reporting of Statistical Results
Jelte M. Wicherts et al.
PLOS ONE (2011)
From Bayes Through Marginal Utility to Effect Sizes: A Guide to Understanding the Clinical and Statistical Significance of the Results of Autism Research Findings
Domenic V. Cicchetti et al.
JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS (2011)
Why Psychologists Must Change the Way They Analyze Their Data: The Case of Psi: Comment on Bem (2011)
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers et al.
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (2011)
False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant
Joseph P. Simmons et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2011)
How Often Is prep Close to the True Replication Probability?
David Trafimow et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS (2010)
prep misestimates the probability of replication
Geoffrey J. Iverson et al.
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW (2009)
A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW (2007)
Statistical reform in psychology - Is anything changing?
Geoff Cumming et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2007)
An alternative to null-hypothesis significance tests
PR Killeen
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2005)
Hypothesis testing and theory evaluation at the boundaries: Surprising insights from Bayes's theorem
D Trafimow
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW (2003)
Interpretation of significance levels by psychological researchers: The .05 cliff effect may be overstated
J Poitevineau et al.
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW (2001)
Calibration of p values for testing precise null hypotheses
T Sellke et al.
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN (2001)
Share Paper
