4.5 Review

Health-related quality of life among children with mental disorders: a systematic review

Journal

QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages 1797-1814

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-012-0109-7

Keywords

Health-related quality of life; Mental disorder; Children; Systematic review

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [325130_125486]
  2. Swiss School of Public Health plus
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [325130_125486] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To systematically review studies about the quality of life (QOL) of children with various mental disorders relative to healthy controls and to describe limitations in these studies. Methods Relevant articles were searched using different databases, by checking reference lists and contacting experts. We included articles that either compared children with mental disorders to healthy controls/norm values or made such a comparison possible. Results Sixteen out of 4,560 articles met the pre-defined inclusion criteria. These studies revealed that the QOL of children with various mental disorders is compromised across multiple domains. The largest effect sizes were found for psychosocial and family-related domains and for the total QOL score, whereas physical domains generally were less affected. The most important limitations in the existing literature include the lack of study samples drawn from the general population, the failure to use self-ratings, not considering item overlap between measuring QOL and assessing for the presence of a particular mental disorder, and not determining whether the children were receiving medication for their mental disorder. Conclusions Children with mental disorders experience a considerable reduction in QOL across various domains. Research studies that avoid previous limitations are crucial to fill existing knowledge gaps.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available