4.7 Article

CDKN2B Loss Promotes Progression from Benign Melanocytic Nevus to Melanoma

Journal

CANCER DISCOVERY
Volume 5, Issue 10, Pages 1072-1085

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-0196

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [R01CA163566, RO1CA165836, F31CA186446, CA076674, CA182890, P01AG031862]
  2. Melanoma Research Alliance
  3. Dermatology Foundation
  4. American Skin Association
  5. Melanoma Research Foundation
  6. University of Pennsylvania Undergraduate Research Mentoring Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Deletion of the entire CDKN2B-CDKN2A gene cluster is among the most common genetic events in cancer. The tumor-promoting effects are generally attributed to loss of CDKN2A-encoded p16 and p14ARF tumor suppressors. The degree to which the associated CDKN2B-encoded p15 loss contributes to human tumorigenesis is unclear. Here, we show that CDKN2B is highly upregulated in benign melanocytic nevi, contributes to maintaining nevus melanocytes in a growth-arrested premalignant state, and is commonly lost in melanoma. Using primary melanocytes isolated directly from freshly excised human nevi naturally expressing the common BRAF(V600E)-activating mutation, nevi progressing to melanoma, and normal melanocytes engineered to inducibly express BRAF(V600E), we show that BRAF activation results in reversible, TGF beta-dependent, p15 induction that halts proliferation. Furthermore, we engineer human skin grafts containing nevus-derived melanocytes to establish a new, architecturally faithful, in vivo melanoma model, and demonstrate that p15 loss promotes the transition from benign nevus to melanoma. SIGNIFICANCE: Although BRAF(V600E) mutations cause melanocytes to initially proliferate into benign moles, mechanisms responsible for their eventual growth arrest are unknown. Using melanocytes from human moles, we show that BRAF activation leads to a CDKN2B induction that is critical for restraining BRAF oncogenic effects, and when lost, contributes to melanoma. (C) 2015 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available