4.7 Article

IL35-Producing B Cells Promote the Development of Pancreatic Neoplasia

Journal

CANCER DISCOVERY
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages 247-255

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-0843

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Cancer Center Support Grant at the Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center [P30CA016087]
  2. Stand Up To Cancer-The Lustgarten Foundation Pancreatic Cancer Convergence Dream Team Grant [SU2C-AACR-DT14-14]
  3. Pancreatic Cancer Action Network-AACR Pathway to Leadership Grant [13-70-25-PYLA]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A salient feature of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an abundant fibro-inflammatory response characterized by the recruitment of immune and mesenchymal cells and the consequent establishment of a protumorigenic microenvironment. Here, we report the prominent presence of B cells in human pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and PDAC lesions as well as in oncogenic Kras-driven pancreatic neoplasms in the mouse. The growth of orthotopic pancreatic neoplasms harboring oncogenic Kras was significantly compromised in B-cell-deficient mice (mu MT), and this growth deficiency could be rescued by the reconstitution of a CD1d(hi)CD5(+) B-cell subset. The protumorigenic effect of B cells was mediated by their expression of IL35 through a mechanism involving IL35-mediated stimulation of tumor cell proliferation. Our results identify a previously unrecognized role for IL35-producing CD1d(hi)CD5(+) B cells in the pathogenesis of pancreatic cancer and underscore the potential significance of a B-cell/IL35 axis as a therapeutic target. SIGNIFICANCE: This study identifies a B-cell subpopulation that accumulates in the pancreatic parenchyma during early neoplasia and is required to support tumor cell growth. Our findings provide a rationale for exploring B-cell-based targeting approaches for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. (C) 2015 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available