4.6 Article

Low rates of treatment in postmenopausal women with a history of low trauma fractures: results of audit in a Fracture Liaison Service

Journal

QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 103, Issue 1, Pages 33-40

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcp154

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
  2. National Institutes for Health Research (NHIR)
  3. (CAPES Foundation), Ministry of Education, Brazil

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: To establish the prevalence of bone protective therapy use in postmenopausal women with a history of low trauma fracture Design and Methods: Clinical audit of 1641 postmenopausal women presenting with a low trauma fracture to the Fracture Liaison Service at Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge between January 2006 and December 2007. Results: A total of 526 (31%) women presenting with a fracture had a past history of fracture, defined as a low trauma fracture after the age of 45 years. The wrist was the most common site of previous fracture, followed by hip, hand or foot, lower leg and humerus. Of these women, only 27.6% were receiving bone protective therapy with a bisphosphonate (89%) or other medication. Calcium and vitamin D supplements were received by 35.6%. The highest rates of treatment were seen for spine and hip fracture (61.9 and 49.3%, respectively). Only 45.1% of women aged 75 years and over with a previous history of fracture were receiving bone protective therapy. Conclusions: The results of our audit demonstrate low rates of treatment in postmenopausal women with a history of low trauma fracture. Better education of healthcare professionals, more consistent recording of fractures in primary care and the use of clearly defined care pathways that involve patients and their carers provide rational approaches to reducing this care gap.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available