4.3 Review

The scientific rationale for combining long-acting β2-agonists and muscarinic antagonists in COPD

Journal

PULMONARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 257-267

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pupt.2010.03.003

Keywords

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Long-acting beta(2)-agonists; Long-acting muscarinic antagonists; Combination therapy

Funding

  1. Abbott
  2. Almirall
  3. Altana (Nycomed)
  4. AstraZeneca
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim
  6. Chiesi Farmaceutici
  7. Dey
  8. Eli Lilly
  9. Gentili
  10. GSK
  11. Meda
  12. Menarini Farmaceutici
  13. Novartis
  14. Pfizer
  15. Sanovel
  16. Sanofi-Aventis
  17. Sigma-Tau
  18. Valeas
  19. Novartis Pharma AG

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bronchodilators are the cornerstone of pharmacological management of COPD. For patients whose conditions are not sufficiently controlled by monotherapy, combining bronchodilators of different classes, in particular an inhaled muscarinic antagonist with an inhaled beta(2)-agonist, seems a convenient way of delivering treatment and obtaining superior results. When administered as combination therapy, short-acting bronchodilators provide superior bronchodilation compared with individual agents given alone. More recently, long-acting beta(2)-agonists (LABAs) and muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) have been introduced, and current guidelines recommend regular use of these agents alone or as concurrent therapy in COPD to maximize bronchodilation. In particular, the combination of a LABA plus LAMA seems to play an important role. This article illustrates the scientific rationale for combining LABAs and LAMAs in COPD, reviews the clinical evidence to support these agents given in combination, and discusses their potential role in the management of patients with COPD. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available