4.3 Article

Conserved responses to trichostatin A in rodent lungs exposed to endotoxin or stretch

Journal

PULMONARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages 593-602

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pupt.2009.08.005

Keywords

HDAC; Biotrauma; Steroids; Gene transcription; Mechanical ventilation; Lipopolysaccharide

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Bonn, Germany) [DFG Uh 88/5-1, 88/5-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Histone deacetylase (HDAC) isoenzymes have been suggested as possible drug targets in pulmonary cancer and in inflammatory lung diseases such as asthma and COPD. Whether HDAC inhibition is pro- or anti-inflammatory is under debate. To further examine this clinically relevant paradigm, we analyzed 8 genes that are upregulated by two pro-inflammatory stimuli, i.e. endotoxin and mechanical stress (overventilation), in isolated rat and mouse lungs, respectively. We studied the effect of the HDAC inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA) under control conditions, in response to endotoxin and overventilation, and on the effects of the steroid dexamethasone. TSA affected gene expression largely independent of the stimulus (endotoxin, overventilation) and the species (rat, mouse) leading to upregulation of some genes (Trif, Cxcl2) and downregulation of others (Cxcl10, Timp1, Selp, Il6). At the protein level, TSA reduced the stimulated release of TNF MIP-2 alpha and, IL-6, indicating that TSA may affect protein translation independent from gene transcription. In general, the anti-inflammatory effects of TSA on gene expression and protein release were additive to that of dexamethasone, suggesting that both drugs employ different mechanisms. We conclude that pro-inflammatory stimuli induce distinct sets of genes that are regulated by HDAC in a diverse, but consistent manner across two rodent species. The present findings together with previous in vivo studies suggest that the effect of HDAC inhibition in the intact lung is in part anti-inflammatory. (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available