4.1 Article

The Nature of Stable Soft X-Ray Emissions in Several Types of Active Galactic Nuclei Observed by Suzaku

Journal

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pasj/65.1.4

Keywords

galaxies: active; galaxies: individual (Fairall 9, MCG-2-58-22, 3C 382, 4C+74.26, MR 2251-178); galaxies: Seyfert galaxy, Radio galaxy, Radio loud quasar, Radio quiet quasar; X-rays: galaxies

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [23244024]
  2. Special Postdoctoral Researchers Program in RIKEN
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23244024] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To constrain the origin of the soft X-ray excess phenomenon seen in many active galactic nuclei, the intensity-correlated spectral analysis, developed by Noda et al. (2011, PASJ, 63, S925) for Markarian 509, was applied to wide-band (0.5-45 keV) Suzaku data of five representative objects with a relatively weak reflection signature. They are the typical bare-nucleus type 1 Seyfert Fairall 9, the bright and typical type 1.5 Seyfert MCG-2-58-22, 3C 382, which is one of the X-ray brightest broad line radio galaxies, the typical Seyfert-like radio loud quasar 4C+74.26, and the X-ray brightest radio quiet quasar MR 2251-178. In all of them, soft X-ray intensities in energies below 3 keV were tightly correlated with that in 3-10 keV, but with significant positive offsets. These offsets, when calculated in finer energy bands, define a stable soft component in 0.5-3 keV. In each object, this component successfully explained the soft excess above a power-law fit. These components were interpreted in several alternative ways, including a thermal Comptonization component that is independent of the dominant power-law emission. This interpretation, considered physically most reasonable, is discussed from a viewpoint of Multi-Zone Comptonization, which was proposed for the black hole binary Cygnus X-1 (Makishima et al. 2008, PASJ, 60, 585).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available