4.3 Review

The impact of whole-of-diet interventions on depression and anxiety: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials

Journal

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages 2074-2093

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980014002614

Keywords

Diet; Diet intervention; Depression; Mental health

Funding

  1. La Trobe University
  2. Deakin University
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [1052865]
  4. Brain and Behaviour Research Institute, the NHMRC
  5. Australian Rotary Health
  6. Geelong Medical Research Foundation
  7. Ian Potter Foundation
  8. Eli Lilly
  9. University of Melbourne
  10. Sanofi-Synthelabo
  11. Janssen Cilag
  12. Servier
  13. Pfizer
  14. Health Ed
  15. Network Nutrition
  16. Angelini Farmaceutica
  17. Meat and Livestock Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Non-pharmacological approaches to the treatment of depression and anxiety are of increasing importance, with emerging evidence supporting a role for lifestyle factors in the development of these disorders. Observational evidence supports a relationship between habitual diet quality and depression. Less is known about the causative effects of diet on mental health outcomes. Therefore a systematic review was undertaken of randomised controlled trials of dietary interventions that used depression and/or anxiety outcomes and sought to identify characteristics of programme success. Design: A systematic search of the Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed and PyscInfo databases was conducted for articles published between April 1971 and May 2014. Results: Of the 1274 articles identified, seventeen met eligibility criteria and were included. All reported depression outcomes and ten reported anxiety or total mood disturbance. Compared with a control condition, almost half (47 %) of the studies observed significant effects on depression scores in favour of the treatment group. The remaining studies reported a null effect. Effective dietary interventions were based on a single delivery mode, employed a dietitian and were less likely to recommend reducing red meat intake, select leaner meat products or follow a low-cholesterol diet. Conclusions: Although there was a high level of heterogeneity, we found some evidence for dietary interventions improving depression outcomes. However, as only one trial specifically investigated the impact of a dietary intervention in individuals with clinical depression, appropriately powered trials that examine the effects of dietary improvement on mental health outcomes in those with clinical disorders are required.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available