4.3 Article

Effects of salt labelling and repeated in-home consumption on long-term liking of reduced-salt soups

Journal

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages 1130-1137

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980013001055

Keywords

Repeat; Liking; Salt reduction; Labelling

Funding

  1. Unilever

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective The present study investigated the impact of salt labelling and repeated in-home consumption on liking of reduced-salt soups. Design Participants received a chicken noodle soup to be consumed twice weekly at home for 5 weeks. Three soups were included: (i) regular-salt soup as available on the market; (ii) 22 %-reduced-salt soup; and (iii) 32 %-reduced-salt soup. The soups were tasted blind or with the label: 'same great taste, less salt and more herbs'. In total, there were six experimental groups. All groups received the same soup over the whole period. Desire and liking were measured at each time of consumption. Setting In-home and central location test. Subjects French consumers (n 646). Results There was no significant difference in liking between the three soups when consumed at home, whereas the reduced-salt soups were less liked than the regular-salt soup in the central location test. Labelling did not boost liking scores, which is probably explained by the fact that all soups were similarly liked when eaten at home. Conclusions The surprising results of the present study in France suggest that a salt reduction of up to 32 % in a chicken noodle soup did not affect long-term liking score as assessed by consumers at home. In addition, initial liking measured at the central location was not predictive of liking after repeated in-home consumption. How far we can go in reducing salt in other products without compromising product quality, and how this impacts consumers' choice behaviour and in turn table salt use at home, are still unanswered questions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available