4.3 Article

Dietary, behavioural and socio-economic determinants of the metabolic syndrome among adults in Luxembourg: findings from the ORISCAV-LUX study

Journal

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages 849-859

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980011002278

Keywords

Metabolic syndrome; Diet; Socio-economic determinants; Luxembourg

Funding

  1. National Fund of Research (Fond National de Recherche) [784844]
  2. government (Ministry of Health and Ministry of Research)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The purpose of the present research was to investigate the epidemiological profile of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) and to explore its potential dietary, behavioural and socio-economic determinants among European adults residing in Luxembourg. Design: Cross-sectional, population-based ORISCAV-LUX survey. Setting: European adults aged 18-69 years residing in Luxembourg. Subjects: A total of 1349 Europid adults, who participated in the ORISCAV-LUX survey, were included in the study. The prevalence of MetS was estimated according to the Revised-Adult Treatment Panel (R-ATPIII) criteria. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the dietary, behavioural and socioeconomic factors independently associated with MetS. Results: The overall prevalence of MetS was 24.7% with significant gender difference (18.5% for women v. 30.8% for men, P<0.0001). Age, male gender, primary level of education, physical inactivity, family history of diabetes and hypertension and inadequate protein intake were identified as significant determinants of MetS, after adjusting for other socio-economic, family medical history and lifestyle factors. Conclusions: MetS is a common condition among Europid adults in Luxembourg and increases dramatically with age, in both genders. Several dietary, socio-economic and behavioural factors explain the disparity observed. These findings highlight the importance of a comprehensive approach to MetS encompassing dietary, lifestyle and socio-economic aspects, both in clinical and community settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available