4.3 Article

Who consumed 5 or more portions of fruit and vegetables per day in 1986-1987 and in 2000-2001?

Journal

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages 1240-1247

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980011003296

Keywords

Fruit and vegetables; Food consumption; Social class; Inequalities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The aim of the study was to describe who ate 5 or more portions of fruit and vegetables per clay ('compliers') in 1986-1987 and in 2000-2001. Design: We used data from the Dietary and Nutritional Surveys of British Adults. Each is a nationally representative dietary survey using 7 cl weighed food records for men and women, aged 16-64 years, living in private households in Great Britain in 1986-1987 and in 2000-2001. Setting: Great Britain. Subjects: Data were analysed for 2197 adults in 1986-1987 and 1724 adults in 2000-2001. Results: In 1986-1987 12.7% were classified as 'compliers' compared with 16.5% in 2000-2001. Manual social classes, younger participants and people on benefits or outside paid employment were less likely to be 'compliers'. Being divorced, widowed or separated was negatively related to being a 'complier', as was being in a household with dependant children or a lone parent with dependant children. Between 1986-1987 and 2000-2001 improvements were seen across social class groups and differences between men and women and between regions were reduced. Conclusions: Only 12.7% participants in the Dietary and Nutritional Surveys of British Adults were classified as 'compliers' in 1986-1987 compared with 16.5% in 2000-2001. There have been some important changes in the distribution of 'compliers', but the low levels overall support the need for a reinvigorated policy drive to improve compliance with fruit and vegetable goals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available