4.3 Article

What's in the lunchbox? Dietary behaviour of learners from disadvantaged schools in the Western Cape, South Africa

Journal

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages 1752-1758

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980011001108

Keywords

Lunchbox; Food shop; Breakfast; Dietary diversity score

Funding

  1. World Diabetes Foundation
  2. Medical Research Council
  3. Human Sciences Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To identify and describe factors associated with food shop (known as tuck shop in South Africa) and lunchbox behaviours of primary-school learners in South Africa. Design: Analysis of data collected in 2008 from a cross-sectional survey. Setting: Sixteen primary schools in the Western Cape, South Africa. Subjects: A total of 717 grade 4 learners aged 10-12 years. Results: A 24 h recall established that 69% of learners carried a lunchbox to school and 49% had consumed at least one item purchased from the school food shop/vendor. Most lunchboxes contained white bread with processed meat, whereas the most frequent food shop/vendor purchase comprised chips/crisps. Learners who carried a lunchbox to school had significantly lower BMI percentiles (P = 0.002) and BMI-for-age (P = 0.034), compared with their counterparts. Moreover, they were younger, had higher standard-of-living and dietary diversity scores, consumed more meals per day, had greater self-efficacy and came from predominantly urban schools, compared with those who did not carry a lunchbox to school. Learners who ate food shop/vendor purchases had a lower standard-of-living score and higher dietary diversity and meal scores. Only 2% of learners were underweight, whereas 19% were stunted and 21% were overweight/obese (BMI >= 25kg/m(2)). Conclusions: Children who carried a lunchbox to school appeared to have greater dietary diversity, consumed more regular meals, had a higher standard of living and greater nutritional self-efficacy compared with those who did not carry a lunchbox to school.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available