4.3 Article

Chronic disease and infant nutrition: is it significant to public health?

Journal

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 279-289

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980010001953

Keywords

Breast-feeding; Chronic disease risk; Formula feeding; Infant nutrition; Public health

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To assess the public health significance of premature weaning of infants from breast milk on later-life risk of chronic illness. Design: A review and summary of recent meta-analyses of studies linking premature weaning from breast milk with later-life chronic disease risk is presented followed by an estimation of the approximate exposure in a developed Western country, based on historical breast-feeding prevalence data for Australia since 1927. The population-attributable proportion of chronic disease associated with current patterns of artificial feeding in infancy is estimated. Results: After adjustment for major confounding variables, current research suggests that the risks of chronic disease are 30-200% higher in those who were not breast-fed compared to those who were breast-fed in infancy. Exposure to premature weaning ranges from 20% to 90% in post-World War II age cohorts. Overall, the attributable proportion of chronic disease in the population is estimated at 6-24% for a 30% exposure to premature weaning. Conclusions: Breast-feeding is of public health significance in preventing chronic disease. There is a small but consistent effect of premature weaning from breast milk in increasing later-life chronic disease risk. Risk exposure in the Australian population is substantial. Approximately 90% of current 35-45-year-olds were weaned from breast-feeding by 6 months of age. Encouraging greater duration and exclusivity of breast-feeding is a potential avenue for reducing future chronic disease burden and health system costs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available