4.3 Article

The Italian National Food Consumption Survey INRAN-SCAI 2005-06: main results in terms of food consumption

Journal

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages 2504-2532

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980009005035

Keywords

Food consumption; Italy; Dietary records

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Agriculture

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The current paper aims to present the mains results of the Italian National Food Consumption Survey INRAN-SCAI 2005-06. Design: A cross-sectional study was performed. Households were randomly selected after geographical stratification of the national territory. Food consumption was assessed oil three consecutive days through individual estimated dietary records. Setting: Italy. Subjects: The final study sample comprised 3323 subjects (1501 males and 1822 females) aged 0.1 to 97.7 years belonging to 1329 households: fifty-two infants (0-2.9 years), 193 children (3-9.9 years), 247 teenagers (10-17.9 years), 2313 adults 18-64.9 years) and 518 elderly (65 years and above). Results: Participation rate was 33%. The mean ratio of estimated energy intake to estimated BMR was 1.41 in adults. Indicators of mean and high inidividual consumption are presented for fifteen large categories and fifty-one subcategories of foods and beverages, in the total population and in consumers, by age and sex categories. The overall consumption of fruit and vegetables was 418g/d. The consumption of red meat was approximately 700g/week, expressed as raw weight. Some specific aspects of the Italian food consumption pattern were confirmed: a large contribution from bread, pasta and pizza to cereals, from olive oil to fats and from wine to alcoholic beverages. Conclusions: The database obtained from the survey will be the key reference for Italian food consumption during the coining years and will be utilized for a variety of purposes including the assessment of nutrient intakes and risk analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available