4.3 Article

Dietary consumption of phytochemicals and breast cancer risk in Mexican women

Journal

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages 825-831

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S136898000800325X

Keywords

Breast cancer; Diet; Phyto-oestrogens; Flavonols; Lignans; Flavones; Mexico

Funding

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia de Mexico (CONACyT)
  2. Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health [D43TW00640]
  3. FOGARTY INTERNATIONAL CENTER [D43TW000640] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To perforin an evaluation of selected phytochemicals intake and breast cancer (BC) risk in Mexican women. Design,: We conducted hospital-based case-control study. Setting: Mexico City between 1994 and 1996. Subjects: A total of 141 histologically confirmed BC cases were age-matched (+/- 3 years) to an equal number of hospital controls. The reproductive history of each woman was obtained by direct interview. The dietary consumption of flavonols, flavones, flavan-3-ols, cinnamic acid, lariciresinol, pinoresinol, secoisolariciresinol, matairesinol and coumestrol was obtained by means of a validated FFQ. Results: Among postmenopausal women, high dietary intake of flavonols and flavones was associated with a significant reduction of BC risk (high v. low tertile: OR = 0.21, 95 % CI 0.07, 0.60, P for trend = 0.004 and OR = 0.29, 95% CI 0.10, 0.82, P for trend = 0.025, respectively); consumption of lignans (lariciresinol and pinoresinol) showed a similar effect, but only among premenopausal women (high v. low tertile: OR = 0.32, 95 % CI 0.10, 0.99, P for trend = 0.051 and OR = 0.19, 95 % CI 0.06, 0.62, P for trend = 0.006, respectively). Conclusions: Our results Support a protective role of specific dietary phytochemicals in BC risk by menopausal status, independent of other reproductive factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available