4.3 Article

Perceptions of New Zealand nutrition labels by Maori, Pacific and low-income shoppers

Journal

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages 706-713

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980007001395

Keywords

nutrition labels; healthy food choice; Maori; Pacific; low-income

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: In New Zealand the burden of nutrition-related disease is greatest among Maori, Pacific and low-income peoples. Nutrition labels have the potential to promote healthy food choices and eating behaviours. To date, there has been a noticeable lack of research among indigenous peoples, ethnic minorities and low-income populations regarding their perceptions, use and understanding of nutrition labels. Our aim was to evaluate perceptions of New Zealand nutrition labels by Maori, Pacific and low-income peoples and to explore improvements or alternatives to current labelling systems. Methods: Maori, Samoan and Tongan researchers recruited participants who were regular food shoppers. Six focus groups were conducted which involved 158 people in total: one Maori group, one Samoan, one Ton-an, and three low-income groups. Results: Maori, Pacific and low-income New Zealanders rarely use nutrition labels to assist them with their food purchases for a number of reasons, including lack of time to read labels, lack of understanding, shopping habits and relative absence of simple nutrition labels on the low-cost foods they purchase. Conclusions: Current New Zealand nutrition labels are not meeting the needs of those who need them most. Possible improvements include targeted social marketing and education campaigns, increasing the number of low-cost foods with voluntary nutrition labels, a reduction in the price of 'healthy' food, and consideration of an alternative mandatory nutrition labelling system that uses simple imagery like traffic lights.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available