4.0 Article

Parents' Preferences for Return of Results in Pediatric Genomic Research

Journal

PUBLIC HEALTH GENOMICS
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 105-114

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000358539

Keywords

DNA research bank; Pediatric genomic research; Preferences; Research results; Survey

Funding

  1. National Human Genome Research Institute/National Institutes of Health [HG005491, HG006615, HG006500, HD077671]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The aim of this study was to ascertain parental preferences for the return of genetic research results on themselves and their children and their choices for genetic research results to receive. Methods: A mail survey was sent to 6,874 families seen at Boston Children's Hospital. The survey included questions assessing the respondents' preferences regarding the types of result they wanted to receive on themselves and their children. Results: Most of the 1,060 respondents 'probably' or 'definitely' wanted to receive genetic research results about themselves (84.6%) and their children (88.0%). Among those who wanted to receive results, 83.4% wanted to receive all research results for themselves and 87.8% for their children. When questions about specific types of research results were combined into a composite measure, fewer respondents chose to receive all results for themselves (53.5%) and for their children (56.9%). Conclusion: Although most parents report a desire to receive all research results on a general question, almost half chose to receive only a subset of research results when presented with specific types of research results. Our findings suggest that participants might not understand the implications of their choice of individual research results to receive unless faced with specific types of results. (C) 20145. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available