4.0 Article

Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Down's Syndrome: Pregnant Women's Views and Likely Uptake

Journal

PUBLIC HEALTH GENOMICS
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages 223-232

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000353523

Keywords

Aneuploidy; Cell-free fetal DNA; Down's syndrome; Non-invasive prenatal testing

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) [RP-PG-0707-10107]
  2. Great Ormond Street Hospital Children's Charity
  3. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Great Ormond Street Hospital
  4. National Institute for Health Research [RP-PG-0707-10107] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Great Ormond Street Hospital Childrens Charity [V1253] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for Down's syndrome into routine state-funded antenatal care in the UK is approaching. Methods: We conducted qualitative one-to-one interviews with 40 pregnant women to ascertain their views on using NIPT for Down's syndrome. Results: The overwhelming majority of women viewed NIPT as a positive advancement in prenatal care, highlighting numerous practical and psychological advantages of a safe test that was highly accurate and could be conducted early in pregnancy. Concerns raised were that testing could become routinised, and that pressure to test might occur with women feeling less justified in declining a blood test that is available and offered by trusted health professionals; the impact on the disabled community and stigma for women who decline testing was also noted. Nevertheless, the vast majority of women said they would be likely to use NIPT, including half of the women who currently decline screening. Women's preference was for pre- and post-test counselling to be delivered by a midwife. Conclusion: The successful introduction of NIPT into routine prenatal care will require guidelines and counselling strategies which ensure women are offered this test in a way which safeguards informed consent. (C) 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available