4.5 Article

Psychological Well-Being Revisited: Advances in the Science and Practice of Eudaimonia

Journal

PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS
Volume 83, Issue 1, Pages 10-28

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000353263

Keywords

Well-being; Eudaimonia; Aging; Development; Health; Biomarkers; Neuroscience; Practice

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [P01AG020166, R37AG027343] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reviews research and interventions that have grown up around a model of psychological well-being generated more than two decades ago to address neglected aspects of positive functioning such as purposeful engagement in life, realization of personal talents and capacities, and enlightened self-knowledge. The conceptual origins of this formulation are revisited and scientific products emerging from 6 thematic areas are examined: (1) how well-being changes across adult development and later life; (2) what are the personality correlates of well-being; (3) how well-being is linked with experiences in family life; (4) how well-being relates to work and other community activities; (5) what are the connections between well-being and health, including biological risk factors, and (6) via clinical and intervention studies, how psychological well-being can be promoted for ever-greater segments of society. Together, these topics illustrate flourishing interest across diverse scientific disciplines in understanding adults as striving, meaning-making, proactive organisms who are actively negotiating the challenges of life. A take-home message is that increasing evidence supports the health protective features of psychological well-being in reducing risk for disease and promoting length of life. A recurrent and increasingly important theme is resilience the capacity to maintain or regain well-being in the face of adversity. Implications for future research and practice are considered. (C) 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available