4.4 Article

Corticosteroid dependent and independent effects of a cannabinoid agonist on core temperature, motor activity, and prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex in Wistar rats

Journal

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 220, Issue 2, Pages 405-415

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-011-2493-z

Keywords

Prepulse inhibition; Startle reflex; Cannabinoid agonist; CB1 receptor; Corticosteroid; Metyrapone; CP55940

Funding

  1. NHMRC
  2. Western Australian Institute for Medical Research (WAIMR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rationale There are inconsistent reports on the effects of cannabinoid agonists on prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex (PPI) with increases, decreases, and no effects. It has been hypothesized that the conflicting observations may be as a result of modulation of the effects of cannabinoid agonists by the regulation of corticosteroid release. Objectives The purpose of the present study was to determine the effects of CP55940, a cannabinoid agonist, and metyrapone, a corticosteroid synthesis inhibitor on core temperature, motor activity, the startle reflex, and PPI. Methods Startle responses were measured in 64 male Wistar rats while varying startling stimulus intensities, analogous to dose-response curves. A stimulus potency measure (ES50) and a response measure, the maximal achievable response (R (MAX)) were derived from the stimulus-response curves. Results CP55940 reduced core temperature and motor activity; these effects were potentiated by metyrapone. CP55940 increased R (MAX) of startle in the absence of a prepulse by a corticosteroid-dependent mechanism but decreased it when metyrapone was administered before CP55940, a corticosteroid-independent mechanism. The inverse of stimulus potency (ES50) was not affected by either drug alone but was increased by the combined drugs. CP55940 increased the prepulse motor gating effects and decreased the prepulse sensory gating effects of the same prepulses but only when given after metyrapone. Conclusions The most parsimonious interpretation of these effects is that CP55940 has some effects through corticosteroid-dependent actions and opposite effects by corticosteroid-independent actions. These two putative sites of actions affect stimulus gating opposite to their effects on response gating.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available