4.4 Article

Mismatch negativity generation in the human 5HT2A agonist and NMDA antagonist model of psychosis

Journal

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 199, Issue 1, Pages 77-88

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-008-1129-4

Keywords

mismatch negativity; model psychosis; dimethyltryptamine; S-ketamine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rationale Many studies have reported deficits of mismatch negativity (MMN) in schizophrenic patients. Pharmacological challenges with hallucinogens in healthy humans are used as models for psychotic states. Previous studies reported a significant reduction of MMN after ketamine (N-methyl-D- aspartate acid [NMDA] antagonist model) but not after psilocybin (5HT(2A) agonist model). Objectives The aim of the present study was to directly compare the two models of psychosis using an intra-individual crossover design. Materials and methods Fifteen healthy subjects participated in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study with a low and a high dose of the 5HT(2A) agonist dimethyltryptamine (DMT) and the NMDA antagonist S-ketamine. During electroencephalographic recording, the subjects were performing the AX-version of a continuous performance test (AX-CPT). A source analysis of MMN was performed on the basis of a four-source model of MMN generation. Results Nine subjects completed both experimental days with the two doses of both drugs. Overall, we found blunted MMN and performance deficits in the AX-CPT after both drugs. However, the reduction in MMN activity was overall more pronounced after S-ketamine intake, and only S-ketamine had a significant impact on the frontal source of MMN. Conclusions The NDMA antagonist model and the 5HT2A agonist model of psychosis display distinct neurocognitive profiles. These findings are in line with the view of the two classes of hallucinogens modeling different aspects of psychosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available