4.5 Article

Stress-induced negative mood moderates the relation between oxytocin administration and trust: Evidence for the tend-and-befriend response to stress?

Journal

PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 11, Pages 2800-2804

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.05.006

Keywords

Intranasal oxytocin; Tend-and-befriend; Social rejection; Yale Interpersonal Stressor; Negative mood; Trust, Self-perception

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Recent evidence suggests that oxytocin, a nonapeptide posited to underlie the affiliation-related tend-and-befriend behavioral response to stress (Taylor et al., 2000), may improve interpersonal functioning by facilitating the acquisition of social support during times of distress. The assertion, however, has not been explicitly tested in humans. Thus, we examined whether the effect of oxytocin on self-perceived trust is magnified in individuals who experienced higher ratings of negative mood following social rejection. Method: In a double-blind experiment, 100 students (50 female) were subject to a live social rejection paradigm following random assignment to either a 24 IU intranasal oxytocin or placebo administration. Mood and self-perceived trust were measured following social rejection. Results: Multiple regression and simple slope analysis revealed that oxytocin administration increased self-perceived trust relative to placebo in participants reporting a negative mood response following social rejection [b = 4.245, t(96) = 3.10, p= .003], but not in those whose mood state was euthymic. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that oxytocin may promote the acquisition of social support in times of distress by increasing self-perceived trust. The findings provide empirical support that oxytocin promotes an affiliation-related behavioral response to stress, consistent with the tend-and-befriend theory. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available