4.5 Article

Examining cortisol rhythmicity and responsivity to stress in children with Tourette syndrome

Journal

PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 6, Pages 810-820

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.03.014

Keywords

Tourette syndrome; cortisol; HPA axis; stress; anxiety; diurnal rhythm

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [K08 MH072958-03, K08 MH072958] Funding Source: Medline
  2. PHS HHS [5K08NMH072958] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Tourette syndrome (TS) is characterized by motor and vocal tics, which are often exacerbated by stress. The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis, a major stress response system is thus of interest for understanding TS. Methods: Diurnal cortisol rhythms were estimated in medication-free children 7-13 years with TS (N = 20) and healthy age-matched controls (N = 16). Salivary samples were collected on 3 consecutive days from the home. HPA responsivity was assessed by examining cortisol in response to a mock and real MRI scan. Results: The results of diurnal rhythmicity revealed a trend showing marginally lower evening cortisol for the TS group. By contrast, the TS group had higher cortisol levels in response to the stressor. There were strong, negative correlations between evening cortisol and tic severity as well as diurnal cortisol and anxiety. Conclusions: The children with TS showed increased cortisol in response to the MRI environment, supporting a model of enhanced HPA responsivity. The lower evening cortisol may be the result of chronic daily stress. Alternatively, the negative associations between cortisol and reported anxiety and tics may reflect biologically based anxiolytic properties of tic expression. Taken together, the results clearly implicate involvement of the HPA axis in the neuropathology of TS. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available