4.5 Article

Effect of acute aerobic exercise on cognitive performance: Role of cardiovascular fitness

Journal

PSYCHOLOGY OF SPORT AND EXERCISE
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages 464-470

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.04.007

Keywords

Acute exercise; Physical fitness; Executive function; Stroop test

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan [NSC 102-2918-I-179-001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31171004]
  3. First-class Disciplines of Shanghai Colleges and Universities (Psychology)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To determine whether fitness and cognitive task type moderate the relationship between acute exercise and cognition. Methods: Thirty-six healthy college-aged adults completed a maximal graded exercise test and were categorized as low, moderate, or high in cardiovascular fitness. Participants then performed the Stroop Test prior to and after an acute bout of cycling exercise that consisted of a 5-min warm-up, 20 min of exercise at moderate intensity (65% VO2max), and a 5-min cool-down. Results: Individuals of all fitness levels improved in cognitive performance following exercise. With regards to fitness, while no differences were observed on the congruent condition as a function of fitness, high fit individuals showed the longest response time on the Stroop incongruent condition. Conclusion: The beneficial relationship between performance of an acute bout of exercise and cognitive performance were observed for both cognitive task types and for participants of all fitness levels. However, a curvilinear relationship was observed between fitness and cognitive task type performance such that participants who were moderately fit performed the best on the incongruent trials, implying that maintaining fitness at a moderate level is associated with better executive function. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available