4.5 Article

On the Ability to Inhibit Thought and Action: General and Special Theories of an Act of Control

Journal

PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW
Volume 121, Issue 1, Pages 66-95

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/a0035230

Keywords

cognitive control; stop-signal; countermanding; race model; diffusion model

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [BCS 0957074, BCS 1257272, SES 1024709]
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) VIDI
  3. European Research Council [312445]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Response inhibition is an important act of control in many domains of psychology and neuroscience. It is often studied in a stop-signal task that requires subjects to inhibit an ongoing action in response to a stop signal. Performance in the stop-signal task is understood as a race between a go process that underlies the action and a stop process that inhibits the action. Responses are inhibited if the stop process finishes before the go process. The finishing time of the stop process is not directly observable; a mathematical model is required to estimate its duration. Logan and Cowan (1984) developed an independent race model that is widely used for this purpose. We present a general race model that extends the independent race model to account for the role of choice in go and stop processes, and a special race model that assumes each runner is a stochastic accumulator governed by a diffusion process. We apply the models to 2 data sets to test assumptions about selective influence of capacity limitations on drift rates and strategies on thresholds, which are largely confirmed. The model provides estimates of distributions of stop-signal response times, which previous models could not estimate. We discuss implications of viewing cognitive control as the result of a repertoire of acts of control tailored to different tasks and situations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available