Journal
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW
Volume 117, Issue 2, Pages 440-463Publisher
AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/a0018963
Keywords
mental construal; abstraction; mental travel; psychological distance
Categories
Funding
- National Institute of Mental Health [59030-06A1]
- Israeli Science Fund [1346/04]
- Binational Science Fund [2007247]
- NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH059030] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
Ask authors/readers for more resources
People are capable of thinking about the future, the past, remote locations, another person's perspective, and counterfactual alternatives. Without denying the uniqueness of each process, it is proposed that they constitute different forms of traversing psychological distance. Psychological distance is egocentric: Its reference point is the self in the here and now, and the different ways in which an object might be removed from that point-in time, in space, in social distance, and in hypotheticality-constitute different distance dimensions. Transcending the self in the here and now entails mental construal, and the farther removed an object is from direct experience, the higher (more abstract) the level of construal of that object. Supporting this analysis, research shows (a) that the various distances are cognitively related to each other, (b) that they similarly influence and are influenced by level of mental construal, and (c) that they similarly affect prediction, preference, and action.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available