4.7 Article

New onset of depression in aging women and men: contributions of social, psychological, behavioral, and somatic predictors in the community

Journal

PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
Volume 49, Issue 7, Pages 1148-1155

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0033291718001848

Keywords

Community; gender; onset of depression; vulnerability-stress model

Funding

  1. government of Rhineland-Palatinate (Stiftung Rheinland-Pfalz fur Innovation) [AZ 961-386261/733]
  2. research program Wissen schafft Zukunft of the Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz
  3. research program Center for Translational Vascular Biology (CTVB) of the Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim
  5. PHILIPS Medical Systems
  6. Gutenberg Health Study

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundBased on the vulnerability-stress model, we aimed to (1) determine new onset of depression in individuals who had not shown evidence of depression at baseline (5 years earlier) and (2) identify social, psychological, behavioral, and somatic predictors.MethodsLongitudinal data of N = 10 036 participants (40-79 years) were evaluated who had no evidence of depression at baseline based on Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), no history of depression, or intake of antidepressants. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to predict the onset of depression.ResultsPrevalence of new cases of depression was 4.4%. Higher rates of women (5.1%) than men (3.8%) were due to their excess incidence <60 years of age. Regression analyses revealed significant social, psychological, behavioral, and somatic predictors: loneliness [odds ratio (OR) 2.01; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.48-2.71], generalized anxiety (OR 2.65; 1.79-3.85), social phobia (OR 1.87; 1.34-2.57), panic (OR 1.67; 1.01-2.64), type D personality (OR 1.85; 1.47-2.32), smoking (OR 1.35; 1.05-1.71), and comorbid cancer (OR 1.58; 1.09-2.24). Protective factors were age (OR 0.88; 0.83-0.93) and social support (OR 0.93; 0.90-0.95). Stratified by sex, cancer was predictive for women; for men smoking and life events. Entered additionally, the PHQ-9 baseline score was strongly predictive (OR 1.40; 1.34-1.47), generalized anxiety became only marginally, and panic was no longer predictive. Other predictors remained significant, albeit weaker.ConclusionsPsychobiological vulnerability, stress, and illness-related factors were predictive of new onset of depression, whereas social support was protective. Baseline subclinical depression was an additional risk weakening the relationship between anxiety and depression by taking their overlap into account. Vulnerability factors differed between men and women.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available