4.7 Review

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of ketamine in the rapid treatment of major depressive episodes

Journal

PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages 693-704

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0033291714001603

Keywords

Bipolar disorder; ketamine; major depressive disorder; meta-analysis; RCT

Funding

  1. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT)
  2. Canadian Psychiatric Association
  3. Pfizer
  4. Sunovion
  5. BMS
  6. Otsuka
  7. AstraZeneca
  8. Janssen-Ortho
  9. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  10. UBC Institute of Mental Health/Coast Capital Depression Research Fund
  11. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  12. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  13. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments
  14. Eli Lilly Co.
  15. GlaxoSmithKline
  16. Janssen
  17. Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research
  18. Novartis
  19. Ranbaxy
  20. Servier
  21. Stanley Foundation
  22. Biovail
  23. Canadian Psychiatric Association Foundation
  24. Eli Lilly
  25. Litebook Company
  26. Lundbeck
  27. Lundbeck Institute
  28. Mochida
  29. St Jude Medical
  30. Takeda
  31. UBC Institute of Mental Health/Coast Capital Savings

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. There is growing interest in glutamatergic agents in depression, particularly ketamine, a glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist. We aimed to assess the efficacy of ketamine in major depressive episodes. Method. We searched EMBASE, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, and Medline from 1962 to January 2014 to identify double-blind, randomized controlled trials with allocation concealment evaluating ketamine in major depressive episodes. Clinical remission, response and depressive symptoms were extracted by two independent raters. The primary outcome measure was clinical remission at 24 h, 3 days and 7 days post-treatment. Analyses employed a random-effects model. Results. Data were synthesized from seven RCTs employing an intravenous infusion and one RCT employing intranasal ketamine, representing 73 subjects in parallel arms and 110 subjects in cross-over designs [n=34 with bipolar disorder (BD), n=149 with major depressive disorder (MDD)]. Ketamine was associated with higher rates of clinical remission relative to comparator (saline or midazolam) at 24 h [OR 7.06, number needed to treat (NNT)=5], 3 days (OR 3.86, NNT=6), and 7 days (OR 4.00, NNT=6), as well as higher rates of clinical response at 24 h (OR 9.10, NNT=3), 3 days (OR 6.77, NNT=3), and 7 days (OR 4.87, NNT=4). A standardized mean difference of 0.90 in favor of ketamine was observed at 24 h based on depression rating scale scores, with group comparisons revealing greater efficacy in unipolar depression compared to bipolar depression (1.07 v. 0.68). Ketamine was associated with transient psychotomimetic effects, but no persistent psychosis or affective switches. Conclusion. Our meta-analysis suggests that single administrations ketamine are efficacious in the rapid treatment of unipolar and bipolar depression. Additional research is required to determine optimal dosing schedules, route, treatment schedules, and the potential efficacy of other glutamatergic agents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available