4.7 Article

Noradrenergic-glucocorticoid modulation of emotional memory encoding in the human hippocampus

Journal

PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
Volume 41, Issue 10, Pages 2167-2176

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0033291711000183

Keywords

Cortisol; emotion; fMRI; hippocampus; memory; noradrenaline; stress

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [HU1302/2-2]
  2. Ministry of Innovation, Science, Research and Technology of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia (MIWFT)
  3. University of Bonn

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Current rodent models emphasize the joint action of the stress mediators noradrenaline (NE) and cortisol (CORT) in conferring a memory advantage of emotional over neutral stimuli. Method. Using a pharmacological strategy of tackling this stress-related mechanism to enhance human episodic (autobiographical) memory, we measured amygdala-hippocampal responses during encoding of emotional and neutral stimuli with functional magnetic resonance imaging in 51 healthy subjects under four pharmacological conditions in a double-blind parallel group design: (i) placebo; (ii) the NE-reuptake inhibitor reboxetine (4 mg); (iii) hydrocortisone (synthetic CORT) (30 mg); or (iv) both agents in combination. Results. Differential drug effects were found in the left hippocampus, whereas hydrocortisone alone selectively decreased hippocampal responses to emotional relative to neutral stimuli, reboxetine potentiated hippocampal responses to these stimuli. Importantly, the inhibitory influence of hydrocortisone was reversed by co-administration of reboxetine. Conclusions. Our results imply that stress levels of CORT alone attenuate hippocampal responses to emotional stimuli, an effect possibly related to a regulatory negative feedback loop. However, when simultaneously elevated to stress levels, NE and CORT act together to synergistically enhance hippocampal activity during encoding of emotional stimuli, a mechanism that may turn maladaptive under circumstances of traumatic stress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available