4.7 Article

Emotional functioning in eating disorders: attentional bias, emotion recognition and emotion regulation

Journal

PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
Volume 40, Issue 11, Pages 1887-1897

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0033291710000036

Keywords

Eating disorders; emotion recognition; emotion regulation; emotions

Funding

  1. Nina Jackson Research into Eating Disorders (RIED)
  2. Psychiatry Research Trust [284286]
  3. Department of Health National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) [RP-PG-0606-1043]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Interpersonal processes, anxiety and emotion regulation difficulties form a key part of conceptual models of eating disorders (EDs), such as anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN), but the experimental findings to support this are limited. Method. The Reading the Mind in the Eyes task, the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) and a computerized pictorial (angry and neutral faces) Stroop task were administered to 190 women [50 with AN, 50 with BN and 90 healthy controls (HCs)]. Results. Those with an ED showed attentional biases to faces in general (medium effect), but specifically to angry faces over neutral faces (large effect) compared to HCs. The ED group also reported significantly higher emotion regulation difficulties (large effect) than HCs. There was a small difference between the ED and HC groups for the emotion recognition task (small-medium effect), particularly in the restricting AN (RAN) group. Depression and attentional bias to faces significantly predicted emotion regulation difficulties in a regression model. Conclusions. The data provide support for conceptualizations of EDs that emphasize the role of emotional functioning in the development and maintenance of EDs. Further research will concentrate on exploring whether these findings are state or trait features of EDs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available