Journal
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
Volume 40, Issue 11, Pages 1829-1837Publisher
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S003329170999225X
Keywords
Bipolar affective disorder; gene-environment interplay; genetics; stressful life events; unipolar depression
Categories
Funding
- Medical Research Council (MRC)
- Economic Research Council (ESRC) UK
- GlaxoSmithKline Research and Development
- Medical Research Council [G9817803B, G0801418B] Funding Source: researchfish
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background. Studies exploring gene-environment interplay in affective disorders now include very large numbers of participants. Methods for evaluating the role of adversity in such studies need to be developed that do not rely on lengthy and labour-intensive interviews. In the present study, a brief questionnaire method for measuring 11 adverse events reported before interview and before their worst illness episodes by bipolar, unipolar and healthy control participants, participating in genetic association studies, was evaluated. Method. Five hundred and twelve bipolar disorder (BD) participants, 1447 participants with recurrent unipolar depression (UPD) and 1346 psychiatrically healthy control participants underwent the researcher-administered version of the List of Threatening Experiences Questionnaire (LTE-Q) for the 6 months before their worst affective episodes for UPD and BD participants, and for the 6 months before interview for the UPD participants and controls. Results. UPD and BD cases were significantly more likely to report at least one event, as well as more events in the 6 months before interview and before their worst illness episodes, than healthy controls. Both manic and depressive episodes were significantly associated with adverse events in the BD cases. Depressed mood at the time of interview influenced event reporting in UPD and control participants but not the BD cases. Age was negatively correlated with the number of events reported by controls. Conclusions. The researcher-administered LTE-Q provides a measure of case-control differences for adversity that is applicable in large genetic association studies. Confounding factors for event reporting include present mood and age.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available