4.7 Article

Personality traits among ADHD adults: implications of late-onset and subthreshold diagnoses

Journal

PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages 685-693

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0033291708003917

Keywords

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD); diagnosis; personality

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health [R01MH57934]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Diagnosing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults is difficult when diagnosticians cannot establish onset prior to the DSM-IV criterion of age 7 or if the number of symptoms does not achieve the DSM threshold for diagnosis. Previous work has assessed the validity of such diagnoses based on psychiatric co-morbidity, family history and neuropsychological functions but none of these studies have used personality as a validation criterion. Method. We compared four groups of adults: (1) full ADHD subjects who met all DSM-IV criteria for childhood-onset ADHD; (2) late-onset subjects who met all criteria except the age at onset criterion, (3) subthreshold subjects who did not meet full symptom criteria and (4) non-ADHD subjects who did not meet any of the above criteria. Diagnoses were made by using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) and the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) was used to assess personality traits. Results. We found that full ADHD and late-onset ADHD showed similar personality profiles with significant deviations on all TO scales except reward dependence and self-transcendence. By contrast, subthreshold cases only showed deviations on novelty seeking and self-directiveness. Conclusions. These data call into question the stringent age of onset of ADHD symptom criteria for adults when making retrospective diagnoses of ADHD. Subthreshold ADHD seems to be a milder form of the disorder that is consistent with dimensional views of the disorder.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available