4.6 Review

Distress Tolerance and Psychopathological Symptoms and Disorders: A Review of the Empirical Literature Among Adults

Journal

PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN
Volume 136, Issue 4, Pages 576-600

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/a0019712

Keywords

distress tolerance; psychopathology; negative mood; mechanism; regulation

Funding

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse research [1 R01 MH076629-01, 1 R01 DA018734-01A1, R03 DA16307-01]
  2. National Research Service Award [1F31 DA024919-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We review theory and empirical study of distress tolerance, an emerging risk factor candidate for various forms of psychopathology. Despite the long-standing interest in and promise of work on distress tolerance for understanding adult psychopathology, there has not been a comprehensive review of the extant empirical literature focused on the construct. As a result, a comprehensive synthesis of theoretical and empirical scholarship on distress tolerance, including integration of extant research on the relations between distress tolerance and psychopathology, is lacking. Inspection of the scientific literature indicates that there are a number of promising ways to conceptualize and measure distress tolerance, as well as documented relations between distress tolerance factors and psychopathological symptoms and disorders. Although promising, there also is notable conceptual and operational heterogeneity across the distress tolerance literature. Moreover, a number of basic questions remain unanswered regarding the associations between distress tolerance and other risk and protective factors and processes, as well as its putative role(s) in vulnerability for and resilience to psychopathology. Thus, the current article provides a comprehensive review of past and contemporary theory and research and proposes key areas for future empirical study of this construct.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available