Journal
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN
Volume 135, Issue 3, Pages 347-368Publisher
AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/a0014211
Keywords
implicit measures; automaticity; IAT; affective priming
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Implicit measures can be defined as outcomes of measurement procedures that are caused in an automatic manner by psychological attributes. To establish that a measurement outcome is an implicit measure, one should examine (a) whether the outcome is causally produced by the psychological attribute it was designed to measure, (b) the nature of the processes by which the attribute causes the outcome, and (c) whether these processes operate automatically. This normative analysis provides a heuristic framework for organizing past and future research on implicit measures. The authors illustrate the heuristic function of their framework by using it to review past research on the 2 implicit measures that are currently most popular: effects in implicit association tests and affective priming tasks.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available