4.6 Article

Why do oncology outpatients who report emotional distress decline help?

Journal

PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages 812-818

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pon.3729

Keywords

cancer; oncology; distress; help-seeking; depression; anxiety

Funding

  1. Cancer Institute NSW
  2. Nursing and Allied Health Scholarship and Support Scheme (NAHSS) - Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveMany patients who experience distress do not seek help, and little is known about the reasons for this. We explored the reasons for declining help among patients who had significant emotional distress. MethodsData were collected through QUICATOUCH screening at an Australian hospital. Oncology outpatients scoring 4 or more on the Distress Thermometer were asked if they would like help' with their distress. Those who declined help were asked their reasons. Demographic variables and a clinical measure of anxiety and depression (PSYCH-6) were used to identify factors associated with reasons for declining help. ResultsOf 311 patients with significant distress, 221 (71%) declined help. The most common reasons were I prefer to manage myself' (n=99, 46%); already receiving help' (n=52, 24%) and my distress is not severe enough' (n=50, 23%). Younger patients and women were more likely to decline help and were more likely to already be receiving help. Distress score and PSYCH-6 scores were significantly lower among patients who rated their distress as not severe enough to require help. Nevertheless, there were patients who had maximal scores on distress and PSYCH in each group. ConclusionsTwo common patient barriers to help with distress are a preference for self-help and a belief that distress is not sufficiently severe to warrant intervention. These beliefs were held by a sizeable proportion of individuals who reported very high levels of distress. Qualitative research and subsequent interventions for overcoming these barriers are required to obtain the most benefit from distress screening programs. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available