4.6 Article

Cancer survivors with self-reported late effects: their health status, care needs and service utilisation

Journal

PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages 2428-2435

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/pon.3304

Keywords

cancer; oncology; late effects; quality of life; health service use

Funding

  1. Macmillan Cancer
  2. MRC [MR/K023241/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [MR/K023241/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveCancer survivors (CSs) are at risk of developing late effects (LEs) associated with the disease and its treatment. This paper compares the health status, care needs and use of health services by CSs with LEs and CSs without LEs. MethodsCancer survivors (n=613) were identified via the Northern Ireland Cancer Registry and invited to participate in a postal survey that was administered by their general practitioner. The survey assessed self-reported LEs, health status, health service use and unmet care needs. A total of 289 (47%) CSs responded to the survey, and 93% of respondents completed a LEs scale. ResultsForty-one per cent (111/269) of CSs reported LEs. Survivors without LEs and survivors with LEs were comparable in terms of age and gender. The LEs group reported a significantly greater number of co-morbidities, lower physical health and mental health scores, greater overall health service use and more unmet needs. Unadjusted logistic regression analysis found that cancer site, time since diagnosis and treatment were significantly associated with reporting of LEs. CSs who received combination therapies compared with CSs who received single treatments were over two and a half times more likely to report LEs (OR=2.63, 95% CI=1.32-5.25) after controlling for all other variables. ConclusionsThe CS population with LEs comprises a particularly vulnerable group of survivors who have multiple health care problems and needs and who require tailored care plans that take account of LEs and their impact on health-related quality of life. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available