4.6 Article

Web-based self-monitoring for weight loss among overweight/obese women at increased risk for breast cancer: the HELP pilot study

Journal

PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages 1821-1828

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pon.3219

Keywords

Exercise; obesity; physical activity; technology; cancer; oncology

Funding

  1. Athena Breast Health Network (a University of California Program)
  2. University of California Office of the President [6067sc]
  3. Safeway Foundation
  4. Carol Vassiliadis and family

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Excess weight and physical inactivity are modifiable risk factors for breast cancer. Training women to use self-help resources over the internet has potential for reducing intervention costs and enhancing maintenance. Methods A total of 50 overweight/obese women at increased breast cancer risk were randomized to a 12-week intervention or a comparison group. Telephone-based sessions trained participants to use web-based self-monitoring tools to set goals and track diet and exercise. The comparison group received dietary information but no training. At baseline and 12weeks, participants were weighed and wore an accelerometer. Results Participants were aged 60.9 +/- 0.8years with a BMI of 33.1 +/- 0.6kg/m(2). The intervention group lost 3.3 +/- 4.0kg, whereas the comparison group gained 0.9 +/- 3.4kg (p<0.0001). Intervention participants who found the website helpful lost 5.6 +/- 0.7kg; those who did not lost 0.8 +/- 0.9kg (p<0.001). Change in physical activity was +70 +/- 140min/week among those who found the website helpful, -6 +/- 75min/week among those who did not, and -34 +/- 207min/week in the comparison group (p<0.01). Conclusions A program to train women to use web-based weight loss tools achieved a substantial short-term weight loss among the majority of participants. Further follow-up is needed to assess weight loss maintenance over time. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available