4.6 Review

Effectiveness of behavioral techniques and physical exercise on psychosocial functioning and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients and survivors-a meta-analysis

Journal

PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 115-126

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pon.1728

Keywords

breast cancer; behavioral techniques; physical exercise; oncology; meta-analysis

Funding

  1. Dutch Cancer Society [NKI 2006-3470]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To evaluate the effect of behavioral techniques and physical exercise on psychosocial functioning and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes in breast cancer patients and survivors. Methods: A meta-analysis was carried out to quantify the effects of behavioral and exercise interventions on fatigue, depression, anxiety, body-image, stress and HRQoL. Summary effect sizes and standard errors were calculated. The presence of publication bias was explored and sensitivity analyses were performed to identify possible sources of heterogeneity. Results: In total, 56 studies were included. Statistically significant results were found for the effect of behavioral techniques on fatigue (ES -0.158; 95% CI -0.233 to -0.082, p < 0.001), depression (ES -0.336; 95% CI -0.482 to -0.190, p < 0.001), anxiety (ES -0.346; 95% CI -0.538 to -0.154, p < 0.001) and stress (ES -0.159; 95% CI -0.310 to -0.009, p = 0.038). For the effect of physical exercise interventions, statistically significant results were found on fatigue (ES -0.315; 95% CI -0.532 to -0.098, p = 0.004), depression (ES -0.262; 95% Cl -0.476 to -0.049, p = 0.016), body-image (ES 0.280; 95% CI -0.077 to 0.482, p = 0.007) and HRQoL (ES 0.298; 95% CI 0.117 to 0.479, p = 0.001). Conclusions: The results indicate that behavioral techniques and physical exercise improve psychosocial functioning and FIRQoL in breast cancer patients and survivors. Future research is needed on the effect of physical exercise on stress and the effect of the combined intervention in breast cancer patients. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available