4.6 Review

Meta-analyses of the effect of false-positive mammograms on generic and specific psychosocial outcomes

Journal

PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 10, Pages 1026-1034

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pon.1676

Keywords

cancer; oncology; mammography; false positive; breast neoplasm

Funding

  1. American Cancer Society [MSRG-06-259-01-CPPB]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: While a previous meta-analysis found that false-positive mammography results affect women's likelihood of returning for screening, effects on well being have yet to be meta-analyzed. We investigated whether the effects of false-positive mammograms on women's wellbeing are limited to outcomes specific to breast cancer. Methods: We searched MEDLINE for studies of the psychosocial effects of false-positive results of routine screening mammography. We pooled effect sizes using random effects meta-analysis. Results: Across 17 studies (n = 20781), receiving a false-positive mammogram the result was associated with differences in all eight breast-cancer-specific outcomes that we examined. These included greater anxiety and distress about breast cancer as well as more frequent breast self-exams and higher perceived effectiveness of screening mammography. False positives were associated with only one of six generic outcomes (i.e. generalized anxiety), and this effect size was small. Conclusions: False-positive mammograms influenced women's well-being, but the effects were limited to breast-cancer-specific outcomes. Researchers should include disease-specific measures in future studies of the consequences of false-positive mammograms. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available