4.6 Article

Comparative adsorption of methylene blue by magnetic baker's yeast and EDTAD-modified magnetic baker's yeast: Equilibrium and kinetic study

Journal

ARABIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages 2448-2456

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2015.03.010

Keywords

Baker's yeast; EDTAD; Nano-Fe3O4; Methylene blue; Kinetic; Equilibrium isotherm

Funding

  1. Key Basic Research Program of the Sichuan Provincial Education Commission, PR China [10ZB034]
  2. Basic Research Program of the Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province, PR China [2011ZR0067]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnetic baker's yeast (MB) was prepared using glutaraldehyde cross-linking method and chemical modification with ethylenediaminetetraacetic dianhydride (EDTAD). The fabricated EDTAD-modified magnetic baker's yeast (EMB) was then employed to remove methylene blue. Comparative adsorption of methylene blue by EMB and MB was systematically investigated with respect to pH, contact time, initial concentration and reaction temperature. The mechanism of methylene blue adsorption by EMB and MB was investigated by SEM, FTIR and Special surface area using methylene blue method. The results revealed that Fe3O4 nanoparticles were steadily cross-linked/incorporated with baker's yeast biomass and the EDTA was modified on the surface of the magnetic baker's yeast. The equilibrium adsorption data were fitted better by Langmuir isotherm, and the specific surface areas were 42.953-226.07 m(2)/g for MB and 94.972-499.85 m(2)/g for EMB, respectively. Kinetic studies suggested that the pseudo-second-order model was suitable to describe the adsorption process. Thermodynamic studies indicated that the adsorption was feasible, spontaneous and endothermic. The recovery efficiencies were above 80% by using 0.1 M HCl. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available